Calvin Klein Mens Cotton Multipack Briefs

Good basic, comfortable fabric, better coverage than most brief underwear. Wish it would hold its shape better, throughout the day.

Still true to fit and finish. Once washed, no shrinking, fits perfect.

I ordered these in Feb 2023 and just recently went to wear them. The leg openings are not symmetric and appear to be cut wrong so they are unusable. Right leg opening is much larger than left as you can plainly see in photo. They are junk...how did these get thru quality control?...I paid good money and they suck. I will never buy Calvin Klein products again...very dissappointed.

Nice product, good support and comfortable.

These are functional, soft, and generally pretty comfortable. However, given they come at a very premium price, I dont really think theyre any better than your standard underwear you can get at Walmart (or Amazon) for significantly cheaper. I can see why others are questioning if theyre knockoffs (they arent - I wondered this too and actually ordered a second pack directly from CK, and theyre exactly the same). They dont really look premium either - just basic briefs, which is fine, but not really worth the price. I also have no idea why they put FOUR labels on the back that you have to cut out - the remaining tag is annoying too. The waistbands feel very cheap and have a slight tendency to roll...theyre pretty narrow and they sit low enough that this usually isnt a big issue, but its noticeable. Fit is as expected, though. Overall, theyre fine but just not worth the price.

I like them. I use them to store my junk.

2 of the labels look to be 4 and another smaller I feel like I have a tail like a kite. They irritate while wearing. I am afraid if I cut them off it will be worse. .

Son los únicos que mi esposo usa

Tags were annoying, cut them off and didnt have issues with left-over snaggy pieces of the tags but just annoying to buy from a company like CK and have to hassle with that crap. Seems like it should be pretty damn obvious to any underwear/clothing company that is run by human beings who have ever worn clothes, or robots that have been programmed to listen to the most basic customer feedback... to just lose the damn tags. In the end, once the changes are put in place - I would think that a tagless brief would mean: 1. Use of less material. 2. Less stitching/less complicated production process. 3. Would provide an idea for something to mention in a stupid commercial or print ad when the advertiser bros cant think of anything to say about underwear. Those days where after sitting in the conference room for 6 hours, the only thing those bros you pay 6-figures have to show for their time is a marker board that says Underwear Brainstorming at the top and these points listed below: - Shoot in black and white, as always. But with 2 white models, as always. In a windy bedroom, as always. - Be original, as always. - Highly attractive young adult muscular man. - Man wears product (Underwear). - Female appears. Highly attractive, unhealthily-thin, seems significantly younger than product-wearing-man. - Female displays Über-lust-filled eyes showcasing the enchanting, borderline-illegal, seductive spell the underwear casts on her. *list would end here* - but not today, thanks to your genius decision to boldly remove the part of your product that nobody wants, instead... (now they can add something stupid to the brainstorm board about the tags finally being gone - like No-Tags-Attached lunch meeting or no shirt, no shoes, no tags - or any number of mind-numbingly stupid ways of bragging that you stopped doing something you never should have done in the first place) 4. Increased customer satisfaction. I guess just focus on number 4, might be reason enough to get rid of the tags. Balls in your court, CK... no pun intended

Been using CK underwear for 20 years now because they last! No, you won’t get 20 yrs out of them, but i do have some that are more than 5yrs and the elastic band is still holding up. No way Hanes or Fruit of the Looms have ever held up half as long as that.